STOP The Transit Tax
Click on the Yard Sign Below to get your FREE Yard Sign or to HELP at Early Voting Locations.
UNFAIR
The Nashville transit sales tax proposal is unfair because it puts most of the burden on low-income residents without clear benefits. Sales taxes affect poorer families more because they have to spend a bigger share of their income on basic goods. The cost of living is already out of control in Nashville. Rent is sky-high and everyday goods and services are too expensive. This unfair tax increase targets those who are already struggling to make ends meet.
On top of that, it's unclear how the money from the tax would be spent. There's no guarantee that it will improve transit. Without clear plans, the money will likely end up enriching wealthy developers and contractors instead of making a real difference for the community. Nashville needs a more balanced solution that doesn't place the heaviest burden on those who can least afford it.
UNSAFE
Crime on Nashville's bus system has recently become a growing concern. Incidents like shootings, stabbings, and assaults have been reported, raising questions about public safety. In particular, two violent events earlier this year involved a bus driver being attacked, highlighting security gaps. Petty theft and vandalism are also a concern.
If the proposed Nashville transit tax expands the bus system, including 24-hour service, without proportional investment in security measures, the likelihood of crime could increase. More riders and expanded routes may overwhelm existing safety protocols, potentially leading to more criminal activity on public transit systems.
UNNECESSARY
The Nashville transit tax proposal is unnecessary because the city and county can explore alternative funding methods without raising sales taxes, which disproportionately affect low-income residents. Existing budgets or federal infrastructure grants could be reallocated to improve transit without further financial strain on the public.
Additionally, the proposal lacks a clear, detailed plan on how the new revenue would be used, making it difficult to ensure the funds would effectively address current transit issues like traffic congestion or route inefficiencies. A more thoughtful, cost-efficient solution should be considered first.